Adaptation in the coastal zones of Mozambique

  • Project details

  • Implementing Agency and Partnering Organizations:
    UNDP, Ministry for the Coordination of the Environment (MICOA)
    Summary:

    The coastal zone of Mozambique is likely to experience significant impacts as a result of climate change during the course of this century. Mean sea levels will rise, wave patterns will alter, and the frequency and intensity of storms will change. More than 60% of the population of Mozambique lives in coastal areas, placing significant pressure on coastal resources and natural capital.

    Project Components:

    Objective: To develop the capacity of communities living in the coastal zone to manage climate change risks.

    • Outcome 1: Climate change risks to coastal zones integrated into key decision-making process and managed at community level as well as sub-national and national government level.
    • Outcome 2: Adaptive capacity of coastal communities improved and coastal zone resilience to climate change enhanced.

     

    Expected Outputs:
    • 1. Coastal climate change risks integrated into key decision making processes at the local,  subnational and national levels.
    • 2. Adaptive capacity of coastal communities improved and coastal zone resilience to climate change enhanced.
    • 3.Best practices documented and disseminated

    Target

    Objective: At the end of the project 50% of men and women have declared ownership of adaptation processes (disaggregated by gender).

    Outcome 1:

    • Capacity Assessment score: 3.83/5
    • At the end of the project 10 local government institutions have been trained in CC adaptation and SLR and coastal erosion risk management and; at least one decision-maker from the key institutions made use of improved climate and vulnerability information in their coastal adaptation policies.

    Outcome 2:

    • At the end of the project 50% of men and women have declared ownership of adaptation processes (disaggregated by gender).
    • By the end of the project 50% of households increase their income by 50%.
    • 50% of households have improved flood and drought management.
    Contacts:

    UNDP Regional Technical Advisor

    Ministry of Environment, Mozambique

    UNDP CO, Mozambique

    Project Status:
    2012-2016
    Primary Beneficiaries:
    Communities in seven pilot sites in three coastal Provinces in Mozambique, Local Government and national policy-makers.
    Project Details
    Funding Source:
    GEF-LDCF
    Financing Amount:
    GEF Project Grant (LDCF): US$4,433,000
    Cofinancing Total:
    9,677,000 (as of December 2011)
    Total Amounts:
    14,110,000 (as of December 2011)

Vaovai Village Coastal Adaptation Project

Summary:

Vaovai village is a community of approximately 600 people, situated on the southern coast of Upolu Island,
Samoa. Residents depend mainly on fishing and agriculture for their livelihoods, with some undertaking paid
employment, or receiving remittances from relatives overseas. Although some areas near Vaovai have tourism
potential, the tourism industry in the area remains underdeveloped.

The village’s land stretches from mountain ridges down to a wide and fertile coastal plain and ends at two major mangrove swamps. The mangrove wetland drains into shallow lagoons and, eventually, a coral reef. Most of the village’s population has moved inland, away from the coastal areas, settling behind the mangrove swamps and along the access roads to the beach and the main south coast road.

This inland migration is mainly a result of previous cyclones which caused major coastal erosion and flooding, and destroyed family properties and other assets.

Adaptation Experience:

Please read attached documents

Results and Learning:

Please read attached documents

Sustainability:

Please read attached documents

Replication:

Please read attached documents

Participatory Coastal Zone Restoration and Sustainable Management in the Eastern Province of Post-Tsunami Sri Lanka

  • Project details

  • Implementing Agency:
    International Fund for Agriculture
    Implementing Agency and Partnering Organizations:
    World Conservation Union
    Summary:

    ###### Background

    Sri Lanka is a tropical island of some 65,700 km2 with a coastline of approximately 1,600 km, situated in the Indian Ocean to the south of India between latitudes 6–10o north and longitudes 80–82o east.

    Project Components:

    * Component 1) Best practices for effective restoration and sustainable management of key coastal ecosystems developed and demonstrated.

    * Component 2) Effective ecosystem restoration and sustainable management are mainstreamed into post-tsunami reconstruction planning and implementation by relevant authorities and donors.

    * Component 3) Coastal communities empowered to manage local natural resources to enhance sustainable livelihoods.

    * Component 4) Project Management, Monitoring and Evaluation

    Expected Outputs:

    The long-term goal of the project is that Tsunami-affected ecosystems in Sri Lanka are rehabilitated to provide full ecosystem services including adaptation against extreme climatic events. The project development objective is Restoration and conservation management of globally important ecosystems affected by the tsunami is demonstrated for, and mainstreamed effectively into, the reconstruction process to support sustainable livelihoods and reduce vulnerability to climate change along the East Coast of Sri Lanka.

    Contacts:

    Jim Carruthers
    Assistant President
    Telephone: 39-06/5459-2429
    Email: j.carruthers@ifad.org

    Tito Santos, IFAD GEF Unit
    Telephone: 36-06/5459-2210
    Email: t.santos@ifad.org

    Project Status:
    CEO Endorsed
    Primary Beneficiaries:
    n/a
    Project Details
    Funding Source:
    GEF Trust Fund, Government of Sri Lanka, IFAD, IUCN
    Financing Amount:
    14,839,000
    Cofinancing Total:
    7,589,000
    Total Amounts:
    14,839,000

Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts on the Coastal Wetlands

  • Project details

  • Implementing Agency:
    IBRD - The World Bank
    Summary:

    ##### Summary

    The objective of the Adaptation to Climate Change in the Coastal Wetlands in the Gulf of Mexico Project in Mexico is to formulate and implement adaptation policy actions and specific measures in representative systems of Gulf of Mexico wetlands in order to protect their environmental functions and their rich biodiversity from climate change related impacts, and improving the knowledge base to ascertain with a higher level of certainty the anticipated impacts from climate change on the country's water resources, with a primary focus on coastal wetlands and associated inland bas

    Project Components:

    1. Implementation of pilot adaptation measures in four selected wetlands highly vulnerable to
    the effects of climate change.

    2. Internalization of climate change considerations on water resources planning at a national
    level (global overlay).

    3. Monitoring and Evaluation systems

    Expected Outputs:

    1. Impacts are localized and
    limited to the sites where
    each pilot measure for
    climate change adaptation is
    implemented. In all cases the impacts are
    expected to be mostly
    positive because the measures
    are aimed at mitigating
    identified and documented
    problems caused by GCC
    impacts, favoring
    environmental best practices.

    2. This component
    will provide the data required
    to define policies to better
    plan and manage water
    resources in the face of climate change
    impacts.

    3. Observation of wetlands will
    provide important data on
    changes in biomass and
    extension as a consequence of
    land use changes and climate
    change impacts. The
    companion CCIG activities
    will generate data on changes
    in water flows to the wetland
    and in water quality.

    Contacts:

    Jocelyne Albert
    Sr. GEF Regional Coordinator
    Latin America and the Caribbean, World Bank
    Tel: (202) 473-3458
    Email: Jalbert@worldbank.org

    Project Status:
    Council Approved
    Project Details
    Funding Source:
    Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF)
    Financing Amount:
    23,800,000
    Cofinancing Total:
    21,000,000.00
    Total Amounts:
    25,800,000

USAID - CASE STUDY Flood Planning and Coastal Resources

  • Project details

  • Summary:

    Background

    Project Components:

    Manejo Integrado de Recursos Ambientales – Integrated Management of Natural Resources (MIRA) is a USAID sponsored project working in 12 of 21 watersheds in Honduras. One of the focal areas is La Ceiba, where the goals are to improve watershed and natural resource management, while stimulating economic growth. At the time of this case study, MIRA was in the early stages of design and implementation.

    To develop infrastructure and strategies to address the city’s serious urban drainage and flooding problems, which are expected to worsen due to climate change and lack of action.

    Expected Outputs:

    Outcomes

    1. Change in local perceptions: This project had a major impact on local perceptions of the need to consider climate variability and change during development planning activities. USAID work was featured three times on local television, and Ken Strzepek has presented results of this study to relevant governmental ministries in Tegucigalpa. The mayor of La Ceiba, who had little prior familiarity with climate change issues, has expressed a strong desire to implement appropriate flood control measures, and has given impassioned speeches about the significance of this problem.
    2. Development of high quality data: The stream flow data obtained during this project indicates that La Ceiba is at much greater risk of flooding than previously believed. High quality information, such as this, is necessary for the development of an appropriate adaptation plan.
    3. Identification of ways in which USAID can help La Ceiba cope with its problems of flooding and urban drainage include: a) Working with disaster management officials to develop a risk management strategy; b) Promoting zoning strategies that limit or prevent development in areas most vulnerable to sea level rise and flooding; c) Improving risk awareness and community preparedness through measures such as a flood warning system; d) Improving both watershed management and the opportunity for tourism by preventing further deforestation of the Cangrejal watershed; and e) Identifying partners to help implement adaptations requiring large capital investment, such as pumping sand to protect against erosion, raising the levees, and developing an urban drainage system.
    Project Details
    Cofinancing Total:
    n/a

USAID Case Study: Flood Planning and Coastal Resources

Summary:

The objective of this project was to develop infrastructure and strategies to address the city’s serious urban drainage and flooding problems, which are expected to worsen due to climate change and lack of action.

Adaptation Experience:

Following the steps prescribed in the USAID Adaptation Guidance Manual: Step 1: Screen for Vulnerability Preliminary assessments, specifically the observation of frequent serious urban flooding events, indicated that the MIRA project was vulnerable to the impacts of climate variability.

Step 2: Convene Stakeholders and Develop a plan forward In workshop discussions, stakeholders from federal and municipal government, the business community, NGOs, and the consulting community agreed that climate change could pose serious risks to La Ceiba.

Results and Learning:

Stakeholders evaluated the suggested adaptations and decided that some, such as the sea wall, were unacceptable because they could have a negative economic impact on the growing city. The stakeholders also suggested additional nonstructural adaptations such as enhancing the existing flood warning system, improving environmental awareness, and stopping deforestation. A proposed hydropower dam was also discussed, but the consultants indicated that it was unlikely to be adequate to prevent flooding from major storms, and that it would probably lead to further erosion by trapping sediments which would otherwise be deposited downstream. Stakeholders decided that improving urban drainage was their highest priority, because of the frequency of this problem and its impact on economic development. However, concern was also expressed about the cost of installing an urban drainage system. To address Cangrejal flooding, the favored approaches were raising the levees, improving the flood warning system, and reducing deforestation. The best solution for coastal protection was thought to be employing sand pumping in developed areas, and limiting development in currently undeveloped areas. However, there was disagreement over how to balance this objective against promoting economic growth.

LESSONS LEARNED 1. Backup plans for funding or involving multiple funding partners from an early stage would facilitate implementation. It was originally expected that the MIRA project would be able to follow up on the results of this study, but its budget was cut, and it was not immediately clear who might be able to step in to fill this role. 2. A small additional amount of money ($5,000 to $10,000) would allow for direct follow up engagement with local parties and potential partners who might be interested in implementing adaptations identified by this pilot. 3. Local advocates are critical to project success. Peter Hearne from the USAID Mission, Pepe Herrero of the MIRA project, and now the Mayor of La Ceiba, have acted as local champions of this issue.

Sustainability:
Outcomes
  1. Change in local perceptions: This project had a major impact on local perceptions of the need to consider climate variability and change during development planning activities. USAID work was featured three times on local television, and Ken Strzepek has presented results of this study to relevant governmental ministries in Tegucigalpa. The mayor of La Ceiba, who had little prior familiarity with climate change issues, has expressed a strong desire to implement appropriate flood control measures, and has given impassioned speeches about the significance of this problem.
  2. Development of high quality data: The stream flow data obtained during this project indicates that La Ceiba is at much greater risk of flooding than previously believed. High quality information, such as this, is necessary for the development of an appropriate adaptation plan.
  3. Identification of ways in which USAID can help La Ceiba cope with its problems of flooding and urban drainage include: a) Working with disaster management officials to develop a risk management strategy; b) Promoting zoning strategies that limit or prevent development in areas most vulnerable to sea level rise and flooding; c) Improving risk awareness and community preparedness through measures such as a flood warning system; d) Improving both watershed management and the opportunity for tourism by preventing further deforestation of the Cangrejal watershed; and e) Identifying partners to help implement adaptations requiring large capital investment, such as pumping sand to protect against erosion, raising the levees, and developing an urban drainage system.
Update on Results

Follow up work on this project has been carried out through the pro bono efforts of Dr. Ken Strzepek and some of his students from University of Colorado. As part of a water resource planning and design class, students examined design options for levees for the Cangrejal River, and concluded that the most cost effective approach would be to build levees which could be raised in the future. Other students examined design options for a storm water management system capable of resisting 10 year floods now, and in 2050.

Replication:

At this point considerable planning has been done, and the remaining obstacle is obtaining funding to implement appropriate adaptation measures. The next step is to identify partner organizations that have overlapping interests, and can support implementation activities.

Senegal - National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA)

Executing Agency:
Directorate of Environment, Ministry of Environment and Natural Protection
Implementing Agency:
UNEP
Summary:

National adaptation programmes of action (NAPAs) provide a process for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to identify priority activities that respond to their urgent and immediate needs to adapt to climate change – those for which further delay would increase vulnerability and/or costs at a later stage. The following summarizes the NAPA for Senegal.

Expected Outputs:

The objectives of this NAPA are:

* To serve as simplified and direct channels of communication for information relating to the urgent and immediate needs for adaptation in Senegal;
* To facilitate capacity building for the preparation of national communications, and addressing urgent and immediate adaptation needs.

Project Status:
Completed. NAPA final report submitted to UNFCCC in November 2006.
Funding Source:
Least Developed Countries Fund
Cofinancing Total:
0
Total Amounts:
195,000
Contacts:

GEF operational focal point:
Ms Fatima Dia Toure
Director of Environment

Mozambique - National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA)

Executing Agency:
National Directorate of Environmental Management
Implementing Agency:
UNDP
Summary:

National adaptation programmes of action (NAPAs) provide a process for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to identify priority activities that respond to their urgent and immediate needs to adapt to climate change – those for which further delay would increase vulnerability and/or costs at a later stage. The following summarizes the NAPA for the Mozambique.

Project Status:
Completed. NAPA final report submitted to UNFCCC in July 2008.
Funding Source:
GEF-LDCF
Cofinancing Total:
0
Total Amounts:
200,000
Contacts:

Climate Change Focal Point: Marília Telma António Manjate UNFCCC National Focal Point Ministry for Co-ordination of Environmental Affairs

Mauritania - National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA)

Implementing Agency and Partnering Organizations:
Ministry of Rural Development and Environment
Executing Agency:
Ministry of Rural Development and Environment
Implementing Agency:
UNEP
Summary:

National adaptation programmes of action (NAPAs) provide a process for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) to identify priority activities that respond to their urgent and immediate needs to adapt to climate change – those for which further delay would increase vulnerability and/or costs at a later stage. The following summarizes the NAPA for Mauritania.

##### Description
The objectives of NAPAs are: To serve as simplified and direct channels of communication for information relating to the urgent and immediate needs for adaptation in Mauritania; To facilitate capacity building for the preparation of initial national communications, and addressing urgent and immediate adaptation needs.

Project Status:
Project Completion. NAPA Final report submitted to UNFCCC in November 2004.
Funding Source:
Least Developed Countries Fund
Cofinancing Total:
0
Total Amounts:
198,000
Contacts:

GEF operational focal point:
El Hadrami Ould Bahneine
Direction de l'Environement et de l'Aménagement Rural

Climate change focal point:
Direction de l'Environement et de l'Aménagement Rural

Mali - National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA)

Executing Agency:
Directorate of Meteorological Services (DMS)
Implementing Agency:
UNDP
Summary:

Description The proposed NAPA for Mali project is aimed at addressing the need to develop a realistically achievable country-driven program of action for adaptation to climate change in key sectors such as agriculture, forestry, water resources, coastal zone and human health. It will specifically develop a program of priority activities addressing the urgent and immediate needs and concerns of Mali, relating to the adverse effects of climate change. Mali shares with other LDCs a low adaptive capacity to respond to climate change impacts, arising from their weak socio-economic conditions.

Project Status:
Project Completion. NAPA final reported submitted to UNFCCC in March 2006. NAPA posted December 2007.
Funding Source:
GEF-LDCF
Cofinancing Total:
20,000
Total Amounts:
220,000
Contacts:

Mr. Salif KANOUTE Technical Advisor GEF Focal Point Ministry of the Environment